-
Spanish Anti-avoidance Tax Law Violates EU Treaties
Read more: Spanish Anti-avoidance Tax Law Violates EU TreatiesDr Stuart MacLennan discusses a recent decision of the Court of Justice of the EU on Spanish rules designed to combat tax avoidance.
-
Police investigations, expectations of privacy and press freedom
Read more: Police investigations, expectations of privacy and press freedomDr Steve Foster explores the implications of the recent Supreme Court decision in Bloomberg LP v ZXC [2022] UKSC 5 on an individual’s privacy and reputation interests, press freedom and investigative journalism.
-
Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine: An Unjustifiable Breach of International Law
Read more: Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine: An Unjustifiable Breach of International LawDr Andrew Jones examines the extent to which Russia’s military invasion of Ukraine amounts to a violation of international law.
-
The rule of law is not rocket science: just follow the law!
Read more: The rule of law is not rocket science: just follow the law!Dr Steve Foster reports on another case of the courts reminding the government to follow the rule of law: Craig v HM Advocate [2022] UKSC 6
-
Religious sensibilities, free speech and condom adverts
Read more: Religious sensibilities, free speech and condom advertsDr Steve Foster, Associate Professor in Law at Coventry University, examines a rare decision of the European Court that upholds freedom of expression over religious sensibilities.
-
Medical Negligence, Human Rights and the Duty to Protect
Read more: Medical Negligence, Human Rights and the Duty to ProtectRebecca Gladwin-Geoghegan and Dr Steve Foster comment on the recent decision in Traylor v Kent and Medway NHS Social Care Partnership Trust [2022] EWHC 260 (QB)
-
The Legal Basis for EU Sanctions on Russia
Read more: The Legal Basis for EU Sanctions on RussiaDr Stuart MacLennan explains the legal basis and decision-making process for coordinated EU sanctions against the Russian Federation.
-
A very British privacy claim
Read more: A very British privacy claimDr Steve Foster reflects on the divorce proceedings between the Duke and Duchess of Argyll, their impact on modern privacy cases and how the case may have been treated differently if it were to be heard now.
-
Coventry Law School and SEGERICO launch two books on Covid published by Routledge
Read more: Coventry Law School and SEGERICO launch two books on Covid published by RoutledgeCoventry Law School and SEGERICO launch two books on Covid published by Routledge
-
‘Tit for tat’ and harassment; free speech implications
Read more: ‘Tit for tat’ and harassment; free speech implicationsDr Steve Foster examines the judgment in Pal v United Kingdom (Application No. 44261/09, decision of the European Court of Human Rights 30 November 2021) and its impact on freedom of expression in harassment proceedings.